7 Common Mistakes Entrepreneurs Make in VC Pitches And How to Fix Them

With plenty of resources available for entrepreneurs about how to craft an effective pitch deck for raising seed-stage capital from VCs, often what’s left out are some of the tactical components of an initial meeting.

The following is a list of mistakes that, despite seeming obvious or perhaps mundane, are still frequently committed by founders and CEOs. The good news? They’re easy to fix.

Mistake #1: Not clearly articulating the basics in the beginning of a pitch.

Every single pitch should, but unfortunately often don’t, contain specific,

…..

https://bettereveryday.vc/7-common-mistakes-entrepreneurs-make-in-vc-pitches-how-to-fix-them-ee2d74e66884

 

The Venture Capital Funnel

The Venture Capital Funnel Shows Odds Of Becoming A Unicorn Are About 1%

The venture capital funnel highlights the natural selection inherent in the venture capital process.

We followed a cohort of over 1,100 startups from the moment they raised their first seed investment to see what happens to them empirically.

So, once you take your first bit of seed funding, what can startup founders expect? The data bears out the conventional wisdom: nearly 67% of startups stall at some point in the VC process and fail to exit or raise follow-on funding.

In our latest analysis, we tracked over 1,100 tech companies that raised seed rounds in the US in 2008-2010. Less than half, or 48%, managed to raise a second round of funding. Every round sees fewer companies advance toward new infusions of capital and (hopefully) larger outcomes. Only 15% of our companies went on to raise a fourth round of funding, which typically corresponds to a Series C round.

The data below gives a more detailed look at the outcomes.

What we found:

  • There was a 2 percentage point increase from 46% to 48% in companies raising a first follow-on round in our updated analysis.
  • 30% of seed funded companies exited through an IPO or M&A, up by 2 percentage points from last year.
  • 67% of companies end up either dead, or become self-sustaining (maybe great for the company but not so great for investors). This was a 3 percentage point decrease since our last analysis. It is hard to know the exact breakdown for these companies as funding announcements get a significant amount of fanfare but cash flow positivity or profitability does not. Also, some companies stumble on as zombie companies for years before calling it quits. Not to mention, the death of companies generally happens without any official announcement, i.e. there is no such thing as a “startup death certificate” (although increasingly, startups are willing to share their failure post-mortems).
  • Not surprisingly the odds of becoming a unicorn remained low in our new analysis, hovering around 1% (1.07%), with 12 companies reaching that status. Some of these companies are the most-hyped tech companies of the decade, including Uber, Airbnb, Slack, Stripe, and Docker.
  • 13 companies exited for over $500M, including leading companies within their categories like Instagram, Zendesk, and Twilio.

Some other metrics:

  • While almost half (48%) of companies raise their first follow-on round, more than half (63%) of these companies went on to raise their second follow-on round which tends to be at the Series B stage. It is much easier to raise a Series B round, than a Series A round.
  • Average time to raise between months stayed fairly consistent across all the rounds, at about 20 months. At the 6th round the time to raise a follow on drops off by about 5 months, which is a small cohort of later-stage companies, but it shows that investors are a lot more eager to invest at this point.
  • The median seed disclosed deal size was $350K while the average was $670K, and the gap between median and average round sizes tends to increase over time, showing that mega-rounds in later stages skew the average upward. By the sixth follow-on round, the median round amount was $40M but the average was $120M.

Methodology:

  • This analysis contains a cohort of tech companies headquartered in the US that raised their first round of seed funding either in 2008, 2009, or 2010 and follows them through to August 31, 2018. Given the date range, these companies have had a substantial amount of time to obtain follow-on funding and exit.
  • Tranches are not counted as follow-on rounds, only equity rounds are counted as follow ons.
  • Of note, seed deals were on the whole less prominent in 2008-2010 than they are now. They’ve risen in popularity in the last few years with the explosion of micro VCs and the greater frequency of seed deals by multi-stage funds. If we were to repeat this analysis a few years from now, the numbers could look very different and there would likely even be a smaller proportion of companies obtaining Series A and Series B funding.

……

https://www.cbinsights.com/research/venture-capital-funnel-2/?utm_source=CB+Insights+Newsletter&utm_campaign=049fba35a6-ThursNL_09_06_2018&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9dc0513989-049fba35a6-87406845

 

 

ICOs: The Good, the Bad and the Frauds

By June of this year alone, Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) have already raised a staggering $US 9.2 Billion, sweeping past last year’s record setting goal of$US 6.1 Billion. ICOs are ballooning in popularity due to their new investment model that empowers both startups and investors. However, before we get into the ugly, which there is plenty of, let’s talk about the good.

https://medium.com/@DigiCorAM/icos-the-good-the-bad-and-the-frauds-66a783607cb5

 

The 3 steps to building a monopoly, according to Peter Thiel

The following is an edited excerpt from Peter Thiel’s Zero To One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future. The excerpt was provided by Currency Publishing. You can buy a copy here.

Brand, scale, network effects, and technology in some combination define a monopoly; but to get them to work, you need to choose your market carefully and expand deliberately.

Start small and monopolize

Every startup is small at the start. Every monopoly dominates a large share of its market. Therefore, every startup should start with a very small market. Always err on the side of starting too small. The reason is simple: it’s easier to dominate a small market than a large one.

https://www.techinasia.com/3-steps-building-monopoly-peter-thiel

 

Car-sharing startup Getaround raises $300m in SoftBank-led round

August 22, 2018

Car-sharing startup Getaround Inc has raised about $300 million in the latest funding round led by Japan’s SoftBank Group Corp, the San Francisco-based firm said on Tuesday. Toyota Motor Corp and some other existing investors were also part of the Series D funding round, Getaround said. The company, founded in 2013, has been operating its car-sharing service in 66 U.S. cities including San Francisco, Chicago and Washington D.C. The company said it will use the latest funding to expand in North America and around the world and to develop partnerships with automakers.

Read more at: https://www.dealstreetasia.com/stories/car-sharing-getaround-softbank-105214/