3 Major Industries And Their Next-Gen Disruptors

TrueBridge Contributor Group

Produced by Forbes in partnership with TrueBridge Capital Partners, the Next Billion Dollar Startups List recognizes 25 of the fastest-growing companies in tech and provides insight into the industries they are transforming. While last year’s list was highly concentrated in five industries, this year, the high-growth startups on our list are more diverse than ever.

Among the sectors represented by this year’s list are insurance (Lemonade), payments (Flywire), security (Anduril IndustriesAuth0), hospitality and travel (SonderAway), and many more. Here are the three industries and their sub-sectors that have the greatest concentration of startups on their way to billion-dollar valuations.

Consumer Products & Technology

With the traditional retail industry in ongoing crisis, the internet has become a refuge for many fashion brands. According to CB Insights, competition in the fashion space has been increasing, especially with the rise of online-first brands using technology to transform their businesses and the industry.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/truebridge/2018/10/17/3-major-industries-and-their-next-gen-disruptors/?utm_source=CB%2BInsights%2BNewsletter&utm_campaign=8ad728dc29-WedNL_10_24_2018&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9dc0513989-8ad728dc29-87406845#7cb032ed3773

 

Liquidation Preference: Your Equity Could Be Worth Millions—Or Nothing

In 2014, mobile security startup Good Technology was valued at $1.1 billion. Employees thought their equity packages were winning lottery tickets. They were wrong.

One year later, Good sold for $425 million. Employee share prices tumbled from $4.32 a share to $0.44. While executives made millions, employees—some of whom paid $100,000+ in taxes on their equity—made next to nothing.

Good Technology’s situation isn’t uncommon. Like so many startups, it had investors and board members whose equity was protected by high liquidation preference—a guarantee that they get paid first and at least a certain amount when the company sells. When startup investors make millions in a sale, but money runs dry before reaching employees, a bad preference stack is often the cause.

To avoid being surprised when the company you work for is acquired, you need to understand what preferences are, why they’re important, and how you can negotiate around them.

What A Preference Stack Is & Why Startups Need Them

If your equity package works out to 0.1% of the company, shouldn’t you be entitled to 0.1% of the acquisition? Startup financing isn’t that simple.

When a startup is sold, the money it makes is paid to shareholders in a predetermined order, called its “preference stack.” As a rule, employees are last, while shareholders with liquidation preference (LP) come first.

Three factors affect liquidation preference, and understanding them can give you a better sense of who gets paid how much and when:

  • Multiple: This decides how much money an investor will be paid. A 1x multiple—standard for mid-stage companies—guarantees the investors get 100% of their money back. Higher multiples become more common in later-stage companies.
  • Seniority: This is an investor’s place in the preference stack. Most unicorns have a “pari passu” structure, in which all investors with liquidation preference are paid simultaneously. However, between 2015 and 2016, there was a 60% increase in deals that gave “senior” preference to later-stage investors—meaning they get paid first.
  • Participation: There are two types. In standard, “non-participating” preference, an investor with a 1x multiple and 10% ownership chooses to either be paid 1x of their investment or 10% of the acquisition price. In “participating” preference, the investor gets both. The latter arrangement is rare—as of 2014, only 31% of deals included participating preference, and they generally include a payout cap.

 

 

https://angel.co/blog/liquidation-preference-your-equity-could-be-worth-millions-or-nothing?email_uid=810303382&utm_campaign=platform-newsletter-101818&utm_content=read-more&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter-newsletter&utm_term=

 

Should you raise money or bootstrap? by Elizabeth Yin

Should you raise money or bootstrap?  (By bootstrap, I actually mean raise < $250k from individuals / angels).

Having run a startup that raised money and now in running a VC, ironically, if I were starting a product company today, I would start out with the mentality of bootstrapping for as long as I could.  And, maybe, just maybe, I might consider raising more money under a few limited circumstances.

I would raise more than $250k if I had a company that:

1) Was growing 30%+ MoM in sales and my operations could not keep up to fulfill those sales

I’ve noticed for operationally-heavier companies (i.e. not SaaS businesses but generally tech enabled services or alike), it can be easy to grow your sales quickly, but often these companies need to throttle their growth, because they do not have enough people to fulfill these services.

2) Was a marketplace with high engagement

Marketplaces tend to be “winner take all” businesses, because they are only valuable if both the supply and demand sides are both liquid and efficient.  And, this happens when you have a lot of supply and demand, which means to really thrive, you need to be willing to invest in a land-grab on both sides.

 

http://blog.elizabethyin.com/post/179189593325/should-you-raise-money-or-bootstrap

 

Blockchain, Inc: A Look At The Ownerless Company Of Tomorrow

Here’s a view of what a decentralized, all-code company might look like in its initial form.

As tech giants like Facebook explore blockchain as a means to reinvent themselves, startups are working on blockchain projects that could displace services like AWS (as with Filecoin) or loosen tech companies’ hold on personal information.

Now, in addition to transforming areas like data and payments, blockchain is shaking up traditional corporate structures. Through blockchain, companies could fundraise without stocks, operate without bank accounts, or pay employees without even knowing their names.

Could we soon see the creation of a completely ownerless company?

Below, we dig into how the blockchain-based company of tomorrow might take shape, from anonymous workforces to shared physical assets.

INCORPORATING A COMPANY WITHOUT STOCKS

Conventional wisdom dictates that startups should incorporate with taxes and stock options in mind. However, tomorrow’s companies might abandon this philosophy altogether.

According to Earn founder-turned-Coinbase exec Balaji Srinivasan,

“Blockchain companies, to build a community, only need an internet connection and a good regulatory environment… They’re open source groups that [manage internal funds in] straight crypto and might not even have traditional, terrestrial bank accounts.”

https://www.cbinsights.com/research/blockchain-ownerless-companies-future/?utm_source=CB+Insights+Newsletter&utm_campaign=8bd320cb86-ThursNL_10_18_2018&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9dc0513989-8bd320cb86-88412737

 

 

These were the 10 biggest European tech stories last week

Happy Friday!

Our research team tracked 50 tech funding deals worth more than €279 million, as well as 5 M&A transactions and 1 IPO across Europe, including Russia, Israel, and Turkey.

We listed every single deal in our weekly newsletter (note: the full newsletter is now available to paying subscribers only). Here’s an extra overview of the 10 biggest European tech news items for last week:

1) Apple is taking control over the power-management technology at the heart of its iPhones in a $600 million deal with Dialog Semiconductor that also secures the German-listed company’s role as a supplier to the US tech giant.

2) Copenhagen-based visual effects startup Spektral was acquired by Apple for $30 million at the end of 2017 in a deal that was only disclosed this week. The company focused on applying machine learning techniques to image and video editing.

3) Helsinki-based Varjo, founded in 2016, has secured a $31 million Series B investment led by Atomicoto bring its technology to market as what it claims is the world’s first VR / XR hardware and software product specifically aimed at industrial use. The round, which brings Varjo’s total funding raised to $46 million, was joined by Next47, the Siemens-backed venture firm, as well as previous backers EQT Ventures and Lifeline Ventures.

.

http://tech.eu/brief/these-were-the-10-biggest-european-tech-stories-this-week-october-12/

 

The Good and the Bad of Bootstrapping

When you start a business, there are many financing options to consider — friends and family, small business loans, angel investment, VCs — but there is no textbook solution for getting a new business off the ground.

One option that entrepreneurs, investors, and average Joes love to love is bootstrapping. Rather than seeking external funding, entrepreneurs who bootstrap their companies rely on savings, early cash flow, and conservative money management. The age-old concept of the American dream lives on in the world of startups — we have pulled ourselves up by our bootstraps.

My co-founders and I have confronted the good, the bad, and the ugly of choosing not to use outside capital in the inception and growth of Ampush. Here’s my take on the double-edged sword known as bootstrapping:

Retaining Full Control

Without a board to impose its ideas, timelines or limits, we are able to be opportunistic, nimble and adaptive. We determine which strategic vision to follow. Since we don’t have to wait for approval, we can execute that vision or make changes at our own speed. We also learn at our own pace; we make mistakes but keep going. By retaining full control of the company, my co-founders — the people who understand the business best and run it day to day — and I are in control of its future.

 

The Good and the Bad of Bootstrapping

Better Everyday: Rethinking the Standard Fundraising Deck

I see hundreds of fundraising decks each year. I’ve been doing this for eight years now, so I’ve been able to see some longitudinal trends during that time.

There are a couple trends that I have noticed emerge over the last few years that I think have become industry standard. The problem is that I think they don’t work and need to be rethought. Not sure if this is going to be true for every investor out there, but this is definitely true for me.

Below are a couple things I’d change, and a proposed structure that I’d recommend for most fundraising decks. This is what I’d recommend for founders that are raising a more mature seed or series A that has at least early signs of Product/Market Fit.

 

https://bettereveryday.vc/rethinking-the-standard-fundraising-deck-406c9061e1c3